Manual EDD takes days of analyst time, produces inconsistent results, and leaves your organisation exposed to regulatory risk. Xapien's AI research engine reads and synthesises thousands of open-source intelligence sources — delivering deep, audit-ready enhanced due diligence reports in minutes.
Xapien conducts the full breadth of an EDD investigation automatically — reading, connecting and synthesising information across hundreds of sources, simultaneously, in any language.
Xapien's AI doesn't just search — it reads, understands, and reasons across sources the same way an expert analyst would, but at machine speed and scale.
Xapien's AI is transformative — but technology alone doesn't close a case. Regulatory-grade EDD requires experienced compliance professionals to interpret findings, apply sector-specific risk frameworks, make defensible judgements, and produce conclusions your regulators will accept.
Endida wraps Xapien in a fully managed EDD service — combining AI-generated intelligence with our in-house team of AML specialists, compliance analysts, and former regulatory practitioners. You receive finished, analyst-signed EDD reports ready for your compliance file. No tooling to manage. No analyst recruitment. No quality gaps.
Our managed EDD service is a seamless five-stage workflow — combining the speed and breadth of Xapien's AI with the sector expertise, regulatory judgement, and professional accountability of Endida's compliance team.
From technology access for teams who want to run Xapien themselves, to a fully outsourced EDD function — three engagement models designed around your capability, volume and risk appetite.
EDD requirements are universal across regulated sectors — but the risk typologies, subject profiles, and regulatory expectations differ significantly. Xapien adapts to each context.
The gap between manual enhanced due diligence and AI-powered research isn't incremental — it's transformational. Here's how they compare across the dimensions that matter.
| Dimension | Traditional / Manual | Xapien via Endida |
|---|---|---|
| Report Turnaround | 4–8 hours per subject (complex cases: 2+ days) | Under 15 minutes for most subjects |
| Source Coverage | Limited to analyst capacity — typically 10–30 sources | 200+ sources simultaneously, every time |
| Language Coverage | English only, or expensive translation | 40+ languages natively processed |
| Consistency | Varies by analyst skill, time and fatigue | Identical methodology on every report |
| Audit Trail | Variable — often manually assembled | Every finding source-cited and timestamped |
| Scalability | Linear: more reports = more headcount | Non-linear: scale instantly, no hiring |
| False Positives | High — name matching without context | AI disambiguation reduces false positives significantly |
| Regulatory Defensibility | Depends on analyst documentation discipline | Structured, regulator-ready output as standard |
Xapien's AI research engine is continuously updated to cover the sources your compliance team needs. Here is a cross-section of what every report draws on.
Tell us what you're looking to achieve. Whether it's a live Xapien demonstration, a conversation about our fully managed EDD service, or embedding an EDD function within your compliance team — we'll come back to you within one business day.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy. We'll only use your details to respond to this enquiry.